Is fate a factor :: essays research papers

Fate is the power that is supposed to settle ahead of time how things will happen. Romeo and Juliet lives were ruled by fate. Even though they thought they should be together fate had different plans for both of them. Fate did not rule in their favour. A large part of the beliefs for both Romeo and Juliet involved fate. They believed in the stars, and that their actions weren't always their own. Romeo, for example, Act1 scene4 line107-113 says, "Some consequence yet hanging in the stars...by some vile forfeit of untimely death. But he that hath the steerage over my course Direct my sail." He's basically saying to his friends that he had a dream, which leads him to believe that he will die young because of something in the stars, something that will happen. He ends with "he that hath steerage over my course" which implies that he does not have control over his life if he looks to another power above himself to direct him. He does not feel that he is the one who makes decisions; it is all a higher power with purpose. Romeo says he is in love with Rosaline, who did not return these feelings. A servant of the Capulet's was sent to invite people on a list to a party that the Capulet's were throwing. While Romeo babbled on about his life with Benvolio and kinsmen. Romeo bumped into this servant who asked him to read the list. Rosaline's name appeared which got Romeo to agree to go the party. This sets everything up for the Romeo and Juliet. They met at the party and fell deeply in love with each other. They realize later their identities, but they are in love and won't let their names get in the way of that strong emotional bind. Fate had an immense impact in this scene. Another example of fate was after Romeo killed Tybalt because of Tybalt killing Mercutio in a sword fight. After Romeo kills Tybalt he shouts, Act3 scene1 line136 â€Å"O, I am fortune’s fool!" Here Romeo understands the full impact of this tragic event on his future and how everything started to deteriorate after he met Juliet.

Laws of Delict and Defamation

It may be viewed as an unlawful and blameworthy act which causes damage to another person's persona. Elements of a delicate before a court will grant damages are: Act of conduct: The plaintiff must prove that the defendant made a false representation Wrongfulness: which he knew to be false Damage: the plaintiff must have suffered, or be likely to suffer loss Causality: because of the false representation Fault: the defendant must have intended to cause the plaintiff such loss There are different types of delicate, but for this assignment, we will be focusing on defamation.When all 5 elements are present, we are dealing with a delicate. In the case of defamation, the type of conduct prohibited is the publication of defamatory material. The delicate of defamation is the unlawful publication, anima unmarried, of a defamatory statement concerning the complainant. A statement is defamatory if it has the effect Of injuring a plaintiffs reputation. The reputation of the complainant is injur ed if the statement tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society.The elements of the delicate can therefore be summarized as the unlawful or wrongful publication, anima unmarried, of a defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff. Once a plaintiff establishes that a defendant has published a effeminate statement concerning him or herself, it is presumed that the publication was both unlawful and intentional. Defamation can be defined as the publication of words or behavior concerning a person that tends to injure the good name of that person, with the intention of injuring that person and without grounds of justification.Defamation is the part of law that aims to protect individuals' rights to their reputation. The right to a reputation, or a good name, is enshrined in the constitution of South Africa. Defamation is committed when one person commits an intentional and roomful publication or communication of words or behavior to a third party w hich has the effect of injuring a person's reputation. Defamation is one of the oldest offences in law and usually results in the payment of compensation to the injured party if proven.PERSON X On the grounds of negligence, person X may institute proceedings for defamation against the museum. All elements are present in this case. Even though the wax figure of X was placed accidentally, the exhibition was displayed to the masses and irreversible perceptions of person X may already eave been formed by the people. Act of conduct Was it negligence or the failure to take action that caused the accident or damages, or was it a willful, positive action. Person X was a victim of assault but was displayed amongst murderers in the museum.Wrongfulness The conduct under the microscope should be viewed as totally reprehensible by the community at large. Person X may have lost the respect of community members at large. Damage The conduct must have resulted in loss or harm to the claimant. Person X may have lost his right to his good name. Causality. The conduct under scrutiny must have caused damages, but if the consequences of the action were too remote to have been foreseen by a reasonable, objective person, then the defendant will escape liability.The wax figure was a clear representation of person X The South African law of delicate engages primarily with â€Å"the circumstances in which one person can claim compensation from another for harm that has been suffered. The Law of Delicate has been regulated and there are basically five elements that have to be scrutinized and accepted by the courts before the claimant is successful.

Life in the 60s - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 651 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2017/09/25 Category Advertising Essay Type Argumentative essay Topics: Life Essay Did you like this example? Life in The 60’s VS 2000 Life as people explain in the 60’s seemed to be less convenient but much cheaper in many different ways. There are so many changes that have occurred over the years. Life seemed to be similar in some ways but more laid back. Times have changed, now more people live life on the go. Life in the 60’s might have had their advantages, but life now is defiantly more convenient. The cost of living in the 60 was much cheaper, especially for people with children. Rent then wasn’t anything like it is now, today it’s more like paying a mortgage just to rent. People, who owned homes in the 60’s didn’t pay as much as we do today for a mortgage. The cost of living now makes it so hard to get by. In the 60’s the cost of a new house for example cost around twelve to thirteen thousand dollars and the price for a gallon of gas was only twenty five cents; people pay well over three dollars a gallon for gas today . As for homes the cost is much more expensive, and homes are still being built the same way. A new house today cost anywhere from a hundred and fifty thousand dollars and up. In which many people cannot afford. Although food prices in the 60’s may have been cheaper, many people grew their own fruits and vegetables. This also made it cheaper for people in the 60’s then food prices today, it is much more expensive. Mostly everything today is bought at local grocery stores which seem to be more convenient for many people. Not many people in this day and age grow their own fruits or vegetables; this seems to be an inconvenience for many. This was a big advantage people had in the 60’s because they didn’t have to pay for the things they grew. They also didn’t have chemicals being put in the vegetables to make them grow faster and larger. As for fast food today, the cost has increased dramatically. McDonalds is much more expensive then it was 50 y ears ago. It is also more popular now then it was in the 60’s, many people then only ate fast food on occasion and drank soda as a treat. This is not the case today. The food industry has made a big profit off of Americans. As for technology today we have a big advantage on the 60’s. People then didn’t have microwave ovens so it took longer for them to cook things. Some people today probably couldn’t live without them. There are people who actually use the microwave to cook all their meals instead of cooking things on the stove. Many people today also own personal computer in which it was unheard of in the 60’s. The only people then who actually had computers were big corporations and military personnel. This is an advantage we have today. People use their computers to work from home. They also can talk to people far away, send emails, and share pictures through their computer. We also use them to pay bills online in which everything was mailed before computers came along. Although some of these things we have today makes life easier. There is also some disadvantages people face. The computer may be an easy way of life for people to do things but there are also some dangers of having this technology. So as we all see, there are always advantages and disadvantages in life and even though things may seem easier this is not always the case. The cost of living was definitely more affordable in the 60’s but would people changes things to go back to those times? Probably not, life is much more convenient with the way people live life on the go today. Many people probably could not do without technology. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Life in the 60s" essay for you Create order